So there is still a lot of time left for Singham 3 to get on the floor.
Golmaal again (2017) movie#
The filmmaker further said that he has a basic idea about the story, but it's too early to talk about it as, according to him, the movie won't begin until the end of next year. Speaking about the same, Shetty said, "Even I've heard that the story is out, even though I myself don't know what the story is – that Singham 3 is being made on Article 370, which even I don't know". It was recently reported that Ajay Devgn-fronted third Singham film will be based on Article 370. Meanwhile, Shetty refuted the speculations around the rumoured plot of "Singham 3". Golmaal is something that can never end", Shetty told Bollywood life. As I've been saying, two years went over this (lockdowns and Sooryavanshi's release).
Golmaal again (2017) series#
Keeping talks to rest, the filmmaker has himself confirmed that the fifth installment of the massively successful Golmaal series is on. Four parts of pure torture are bad enough, if you ask me.With things are looking a lot brighter than the year or two, the talks of Golmaal 5 have started making noise again. All a discerning viewer can hope for is that a totally unnecessary sequel isn’t made in the footsteps of this one. With this much going against it, it is a wonder how such projects make the money they do. What kind of anaath ashram overflows with so much opulence as the one seen time and again on screen? The answer lies in Rohit Shetty’s limited view of the world. Many holes can be poked at Golmaal Again, but one seemingly insignificant bit made me think long and hard at the crassness of it all. Those supposedly funny scenes only succeed in alienating you further.Ī comedy/mystery with neither humour nor intrigue ceases to be anything at all, let alone a watchable piece of cinema. Perhaps it was Shetty’s intention to fill the film with enough laughs so that it would veer one’s attention away from the otherwise hollow sections of the storyline. Even the whole ‘Nana Patekar’s ghost gag’ left much to be desired. They fail on two fronts: they make you cringe, and they make little sense in the overall scheme of things. Slapstick sequences abound at every conceivable corner of Golmaal Again. But between all the memories and nostalgia, a mysterious presence slowly makes itself felt. As they return to their childhood home, the group is reunited with the establishment’s librarian, Anna. The only commonality between the two groups is the regard for their old orphanage.
![golmaal again (2017) golmaal again (2017)](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BNGJjM2ZhMGItZGI1My00ZDI4LTlmMGEtM2YyZDljMGE5MWMwXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNjY1MTg4Mzc@._V1_.jpg)
Lucky, Madhav, and Laxman Number 2, have remained best friends, with the former being as indecipherable as ever. Gopal is still afraid of ghosts and the dark, and Laxman Number 1 continues to have a significant lisp. Decades later, the groups have remained pretty much the same. When things get out of hand one evening, the boys decide to leave the anaath ashram and head their separate ways. The boys are often reprimanded for their aggressive behaviour by their benevolent founder. The opposing factions are adored by a girl (Khushi) who was abandoned at the ashram many years ago.
![golmaal again (2017) golmaal again (2017)](https://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/default/files/styles/smartcrop_800x800/public/images/tv-images/2018/01/23/star-gold.jpg)
![golmaal again (2017) golmaal again (2017)](https://stat2.bollywoodhungama.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Golmaal-Again-8.jpg)
Gopal and Laxman Number 1 are as thick as thieves, and share a rivalry with Madhav, Lucky, and Laxman Number 2. Part 4 goes back to childhood, and the orphanage in which the friends spent their formative years. And that sad excuse for a beginning sets the tone for all the terrible stuff to follow. Right from the outset, Shetty’s nonsensical vision takes shape on screen with a raucous dance number featuring all the leads. I must think very hard to conjure up even a single redeemable moment from Golmaal Again. Long, convoluted, unintelligent, and lacking in basic sense-these are just some of the words that can be used to describe the plot. The humour, if one were to even dignify it by calling it that, is so puerile that there isn’t a single moment’s worth of laughter in the whole 151 minutes.